by mwolf on Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:17 pm
This is an old post, so I am not sure it is still relevant, but US Heritage Group is a good start, VA Lime Works and PA Limeworks- Andy DeGruchey. Also regarding using hydrated there are a number of considerations making "real" putty a better choice:
We have successfully built with putty for thousands of years , but dry hydrate has only been around for about 100 so why risk it? Here are some things that many believe contribute to putty being a better choice than hydrated:
1) Differing firing temperatures- many bagged hydrate limes now sold are fired at too high of a temp do not behave like limes of the past
2) Prolonged slaking of lime putty creates much finer particles consequently crystalline structures upon carbonation are different between each and the putty made mortar carbonates more effectively.
3)ASTM allows bagged hydrated lime to be bagged with 6%-7% (I can't remember which) of the lime already carbonated and as the bag leaves the production facility, travels, arrives at the supply house, sits at the supply house, arrives at the mason's shop, sits at the mason's shop, travels to the job....all the while it is carbonating and by the time you mix it, all of that carbonated material is inert and you have no idea what you are truly mixing.
4) Lastly, there are substantial volumetric differences between the dry hydrate and the paste made from the dry hydrate thus mixing by volume while the hydrate is dry creates a mix very different than the historic mix. (This can easily be compensated for by first making the paste and then measuring and mixing, but how many masons are aware or....make the time....