Inappropriate rooftop addition

del.icio.us Digg Reddit StumbleUpon

Historic three-story building before rehab. National Park Service Photos.


The historic character...

This three-story building is part of a historic district noted for late-19th century commercial buildings. It is prominently located on a corner site and flanked by two-story structures. Built in 1890, the structure has remained unchanged in appearance for ninety years. Its most distinctive historic features include jack-arched windows, a corbelled beltcourse, and pilasters. The building was in poor condition over a period of time, having lost an ornamental projecting entablature in the 1950s and suffering fire damage on the third floor of the interior.

...and how it was lost in the rehabilitation.

In the rehabilitation for mixed retail and residential use, the work included a 1 1/2 story addition to accommodate eight loft bedroom apartment units over the retail and office space. The new addition was designed to be flush with the existing facade in order to maximize the floor space (see photo).


image2.jpg (25094 bytes)

image3.jpg (18075 bytes)

TOP: Out of scale addition with a new vertical emphasis. BOTTOM: Historicized
addition with dates.


To further blend in with the historic district, the owner decided to use a cornice with brackets similar to the lost cornice--the spacing of the brackets was modified to include small modern windows. Dates were added to the facade to differentiate the historic construction from the new addition (see photo). As a result of the new work, the height of the building had now been increased by almost one-third, giving it a new vertical emphasis it never had historically.

The historicizing of the addition's detailing (jack-arch windows, corbelled beltcourse, pilasters, brackets, and wrought iron cresting) eliminated any visual distinction between the new addition and the historic building. Adding dates (1890 and 1980) as a device did not, in and of itself, distinguish old from new. In brief, the addition had significantly altered the the building's mass, scale and proportional relationships and changed its character. In spite of the fact that work on the first two floors was considered appropriate, the overall rehabilitation did not meet Standards 2 and 9.

What should you know?

Rooftop additions are sometimes seen as a way of increasing the usable floor area of historic buildings located in urban areas. When this type of new addition is being considered, it needs to be designed in a way that it is as inconspicious as possible when viewed from the street. Even if the new addition is set back from the plane of the facade, making it inconpicuous is difficult on a two or three story building. For this reason, rooftop additions are generally not recommended.

Suggestions from the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation:

Standard 2: The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided.

Standard 9:New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the property. The new work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be compatible with the massing, size, scale, and architectural features to protect the historic integrity of the property and its environment.


Source of Story: National Park Service

Recently Awarded
Forbes' Best of the Web!
Sponsored Links